-
Top 5 Nathan Hale’s Hazardous Tales

Thrilling, daring, and downright gruesome stories from American history, in graphic novel form.
- Trenches, Treaties, Mud and Blood: This one gets number one spot for sheer ambition in retelling the foundational history of WW1. All in the form of animal mascots. It sounds silly, but it did help differentiate all the countries and show how the Great War really spanned the globe and changed modern warfare. It does so in a way that gives you a good grasp of major events and battles, and the sheer hell of war, while also pointing out that this is just a little peek into the theater of WW1. And like any good historical fiction, it made me want to learn more.
- Alamo All Stars: Another book about epic battles. Yes, I say battles because even though everyone remembers the Alamo they may not realize it’s because the battle of the Alamo was such a failure that the next battle is where they said their famous cry. It delves into the Mexican side of the story, why Davy Crockett was such a beloved hero and was a rollicking good time.
- Cold War Correspondent: A lot of these books get into the top 5 by virtue of introducing me to something new. In this case, I learned about Marguerite Higgins, one of the first female war correspondents, and the Korean War which tends to get buried between WW2 and Vietnam.
- Lafayette: I’ll admit, I hear the Hamilton rap every time I see the title. But that aside, like Hamilton did for Alexander, this book dives into the Marquis’ life, highlighting his flaws, his glories and how this orphan was desperate for a family and soon found one with his Revolutionary comrades. He made this ultra-privileged French noble from centuries ago feel human.
- The Underground Abductor: This one gets into the top 5 by virtue of being the first one I read and thus getting me into this epic series of American History. Not to mention introducing me to the greater story of Harriet Tubman. I mean, not just the part about being the most successful conductor of the Underground Railroad but like everything that came before and after-her real name, Aramanita Ross, her husband, being hit on the head by a brick which gave her narcolepsy and visions that aided her work, freeing 800 slaves on a plantation, and so much more. We’re always taught that Harriet Tubman is a hero and role model, this story helped hit it home.
-
Ranking Feminine Pursuits

To continue the journey of historical romances with non-traditional leads, Waite’s Feminine Pursuits trilogy celebrates women loving women, and the their fight for rights and respect in their occupations. It’s also interesting as these can be read as stand-alones rather than a trilogy. Sure, characters pop up from other books but it is not very noticeable. Plus it’s very supportive women helping women which we love to see.
- The Hellion’s Waltz: The final book in the series may be the shortest, but it’s the sweetest and has the best balance of character arcs. Maddie, the slightly amoral weaver sticking justice to con-men, and Sophie, the straitlaced, modest pianist are darling together. Both have big hearts, but Maddie almost becomes a martyr for her cause, not seeing that she can depend on her friends instead of protecting them all the time. And Sophie doubts herself, her judgement, her beauty, her talent, but her time with Maddie not only opens her eyes to the fact that sometimes you must resort to swindle to obtain justice. But that she is wonderfully talented and should seize her chance to shine. It’s perfectly romantic, and gives wonderful insight to London’s industrial age and how it started the mistreatment of the labor force (especially the female labor force in weaving which is considered unimportant even though WE ALL WEAR CLOTHES) by capitalists. Also custom-designed instruments are surprisingly interesting.*
- The Lady’s Guide to Celestial Mechanics: The first book in the trilogy stuns as it focuses on the widowed Catherine St. Day’s invitation to one Mr. Muchelney to translate a work of astronomy for London’s scientific society. Mr. Muchelney is dead, but his daughter, Lucy, who did most of the calculations for his work is eager to take the job. She needs to take her mind off of her girlfriend marrying someone else. This book worked in delving into Catherine’s complicated feelings. Her husband was emotionally abusive and she has no interest in putting herself under the thumb of another in marriage so a fling with Lucy should be easy. No financial constraints or contracts to bind them, but love gets in the way. The conflict is interesting as Catherine is so insecure about not having a talent, and being placed second to someone else’s scientific pursuits. Just in general, feeling inferior because she’s more of an artistic brain. So it was wonderful to see her overcome these fears as well as her fears about being a good partner to Lucy and coming to their own arrangement that solidifies their love for each other even though they can never be open. But it is second because Lucy’s arc is more vague. She has to stand up for herself against the all-male scientist brigade but Catherine undoubtedly gets more depth in their relationship. Also there is a point where Lucy states that her feelings for Catherine are different from her ex-girlfriend because she (the ex) was selfish, expecting Lucy to revolve around her. But it comes out of the left field as we don’t get much insight to their relationship beforehand. I will say that Lucy schooling the scientists at the end was a big “You go, girl” moment.
- The Care and Feeding of Waspish Widows: Much as above, the widowed Agatha Griffin gets the bulk of interesting character development from finding second love after the death of her beloved husband to her maternal struggle of fearing for her radical son’s future and his love life. Also learning to live again as she used her work as an engraver to push down her feelings of loss and grief. Perhaps it’s because Catherine and Agatha are older (and you so rarely see middle aged romance protagonists) but they’re in different places in their lives compared to young heroines and have different challenges. It’s just interesting! Penelope is almost middle aged, happily married to her brother’s lover (whose conveniently away on a waler with said brother) so she can freely bee-keep and sleep with whomever she wants. But even though she’s content, she’s lonely not inspiring the same level of love. Perhaps she isn’t capable until Agatha. Much like Lucy, her arc feels less-defined. There’s a bit about learning to stand up for herself but eh, Agatha was just more fascinating as a character. I do appreciate how Waite has her novels are set within months instead of the space of days or a few weeks. It makes Agatha and Penelope’s friendship to love more real. This also has the most atmosphere as it deals with the timely politics of a small town fiercely involved in the divorce of King George and Queen Charlotte and what it means for noble women in divorce. It touches on censorship, morality brigades, and the hypocrisies of rich white women feminism. Plus lots of technical research on bee-keeping and print-engravings. It made the town come alive, but also slowed the book so it felt longer than needed even if I enjoyed the Christmas Eve ghost story. So this comes last. Also the cover for this one is atrocious. It’s like bad photoshop, the model on the cover looks like she belongs in a modern day office, not a regency romance!
*Sidenote. There is a reoccuring character, Mr. Frampton who is a scientist that is basically inventing the future computer. I think he’s an expy of Charles Babbage. Much like Babbage, he is having trouble figuring how to compute it. Naturally, I thought by the third book with Maddie’s weaving skills and punch-card system and Sophie’s musical technique, they’d give him the idea of how it could be done. Much like how Ada Lovelace did that for Babbage in real life. But it didn’t happen! It felt like a set up with no follow-through. Then again, it was a minor part of the book, but it bothered me.
Now on a semi-related subject. I realized as I was reading this series is that it’s all bi x lesbian. Makes sense as Waite says she’s bi. But I think all of the queer books I’ve read (which take with a grain of salt is like four authors.) it’s always bi woman x lesbian. This trilogy. Ashley Herring Blake’s Bright Falls trilogy. The only lesbian x lesbian I’ve read was Herrera’s An Island Princess Starts a Scandal.
On the other side of the coin, in the mlm, Alexis Hall’s Paris Ballincourt and Boyfriend Materials is all gay x gay men. Two out of three couples in Seducing the Sedgewicks is gay x gay man. Only one bi man x gay man.
If I put my little social psychology cap if I may, I have a theory.
Let’s be honest, a majority of romance readers are straight women, me included. Correct me if I’m wrong, that’s like the first thought when it comes to the demographic. So perhaps the bi woman x lesbian is popular because even though it’s not the point of the book, the bi woman is more palatable. Like she could be interested in a man which makes her relatable to readers even though it’s not the point of the story.
But if that’s the logic, why wouldn’t there be more bi men so the readers can imagine the protagonist is still interested in woman even though it’s not the point of the story.
Well there’s a phenomena of women fetishizing gay men just as men objectifying lesbians. Something I simply don’t understand when it comes to either gender. It’s gross to me. But back to the point, maybe it plays to the wider perception that bi women are palatable and bi men are rare or a “stop to gay town.”
So comment below. Should there be more bi men in romantic fiction? More bi man x man, bi woman x bi woman, bi x bi in general? (Lyla Lee made an adorable bi guy x bi girl couple in I’ll Be the One)? Are there more lesbian in fiction than I realize?
Well it’s pride month in June so it’s some food for thought. Comment below!
-
Kathryn Lasky Interview

Kathryn Lasky is the prolific NYT-bestselling author of Guardians of Ga’hoole, Tangled in Time, Georgia O’Keefe mysteries and many other books in various genres. She graciously took the time to answer my questions about inspiration, world-building and more. Enjoy!
- What usually comes first-the idea of a character or the premise?
It’s sort of six in one half dozen of the other, but by and large, I think it’s usually the premise of the book.
Such as in FACELESS, I want to write a book about World War 2, and then maybe I can have a girl who is a spy, but then I mix in a little fantasy: this girl belongs to small clan of spies called the Tabula Rasa that has worked ceaselessly to fight oppression. They can pass unseen through enemy lines and “become” other people without being recognized. They are, essentially, faceless.
2. Does your writing process/narrative tone change from when you do nonfiction, mystery, fantasy to historical fiction?
Yes the tone does change. In non fiction, it is a much more neutral point of view, a more distant third person. Meanwhile in fiction it is a much more up close, and personal POV as I am trying to inhabit a character.
3. How do you choose which historic event to center a story on with over a thousand years to choose from?
Well I have my favorite eras so to speak—like World War 2 and the 16th century. I also like 19th and 18th century American history.
(more…) -
Ranking Seducing the Sedgwicks

I know, it’s been so long since I’ve done a ranking, but I’m glad to start the first ranking of 2025 with Cat Sebastian’s sweet and steamy Sedgwick trilogy. Lots of alliteration there. Much like Herrera’s Las Leonas trilogy, it dives into the forgotten bits of history aka gay people have always existed and managed to find love and found family outside of the norms. And that titles aren’t all that’s cracked up to be because it’s built on the exploited and will make you deny your true self. But moreover, it’s about love and how it’s never sinful and you are worthy of it, no matter your traumas or failings.
- A Gentleman Never Keeps Score: This one was probably the most complex yet heartwarming romance where I wasn’t sure how Sebastian would be able to reconcile their vastly different backgrounds. Hartley being a dandy white gentleman whose reputation is stained by his proclivities and Sam who’s a working-class black man and former boxer. Any association would be a danger to Sam, exposing him as gay as well as racism. Plus Hartley has a boat-load of trauma to work through that makes him prickly and difficult- it’s hard being a gay man who’s scared of men. Sometimes, I agreed with Hartley that Sam is an absolute saint because he gives so much. Yet it never feels like an unequal partnership as Hartley sees past the fetishisized stereotypes other lovers put on Sam. Also just as Hartley must reconcile how much being a “gentleman” is worth to him, Sam must struggle with what it means to be independent and when to accept help. It was just so good!
- It Takes Two to Tumble: This was a perfect encapsulation of grumpy x sunshine a-la Sound of Music. Just as Captain Dacre is taken by the vicar, Ben’s love for baby animals, laughter and little miracles of God, I was taken to. The two form a sweet relationship navigating the intensity of their feelings and their futures in a world where a relationship like theirs cannot see the light yet Ben doesn’t want to go through a sham marriage. It’s the usual stakes for historical m/m, but refreshing as neither have much angst over their sexuality as a sin, but moreover what they’re willing to do to make a future work. The only thing that makes pulls it to #2 is that the subplot with Dacre reconnecting with his children feels more told than shown. Also the fact that Ben is acting like a nanny to three wayward children of stern sea captain before heading back to his vicarage reminds me so much of SoM that I keep picturing Christopher Plummer instead of the cover models.
- Two Rogues Make a Right: This one had so much potential since Martin and Will’s “friendship” has teased throughout the series. The relationship itself is fine, very sweet actually as Will and Martin acknowledge that they’re more than friends, but kind of soul mates. But the conflict feels drawn out, hampered by both being self-sacrificing yet insisting they were selfish, and it just got tired after the last 50 pages. Also the cover model for Will reminds me of Chris Colfer and it takes me out of the story.
-
High School AUs
What is it about them that draws people in?
Is it that there is a enclosed space where you have your friends, enemies, and frenemies all in one place making it a perfect breeding ground for conflict and hijinks?
Is it because it harkens to the author and readers’ nostalgia of the glory days?
Is it that it’s where a lot of coming of age begins where you reckon with the innocence of childhood and the beginning of responsibilities, but you have a lot more idealism compared to adulthood?
I read five different high school AUs featuring IPs- Dc Superhero Girls, Descendants, Equestria Girls, Ever After High and Monster High.

Which is funny because I think DC Superhero Girls and Equestria High by nature that they’re targeting a younger demographic, could be Middle School AUs. I say middle school because I think the only thing that separates the high school and middle school AUs is the intensity of romance. Middle school is more crushes, while high school is relationships.
But as everyone knows middle school is hell, they slap the High School AU label on it instead. Plus they want it to be aspirational for the readers who are the 9-12 demographic and high school kids are so much cooler.
I skimmed most of these books when I was younger so this was my first real read-through of each. DC Superhero Girls by Lisa Yee was fun, good for its age and I liked the different variations of what it means to be a family legacy, the pressure of expectations etc.

Equestria Girls by Perdita Finn- I have never read, never seen the movies. The 4th generation of MLP was a bit after my time. Still it was cute, friendship was pounded in my head. I was a little confused that it was more magical realism than a straight High School AU so that took some getting used to. Like the first book establishes that magic is not a thing in the human world and by the second, everyone just accepts it and they start getting power ups like Sailor Moon.

Many say there are similarities between Disney Descendants and Ever After High, both being high school AUs of popular fairytales and focusing on being born a villain and changing destiny and who does it better. In my opinion, Ever After High did it better. Sorry.

Descendants has a bad case of only focusing on Mal to the detriment of the supporting cast while the Ever After High books by Shannon Hale and School Stories by Suzanne Selfors expands the worlds and the characters and what they face by forging their own paths. At least Jessica Brody’s School of Secrets rectifies the too-much-Mal problem by giving minor characters a chance in the spotlight but has so little promotion that no one knows how good the books are.

Finally, Monster High was such a nostalgia trip, I loved it. Especially as I found out about the Monster High diaries for the first time and read them all in two days. I mean, there were only five so it was quick, but still. I enjoyed how Monstrata gave readers a glimpse into the family lives of the goulfriends while the Daneshvari quartet focuses on the school and overarching mystery.

And yeah, that’s about it. Put your thoughts in the comments below. What draws people to high school AUs? Should there be middle school AUs? Any other thoughts.
#dcsuperherogirls, #disneydescendants, #equestriagirls, #everafterhigh, #gittydaneshvari, #goulfriends, #highschoolau, #jessicabrody, #lisayee, #melissadelacruz, #middlegrade, #monsterhigh, #monsterhighdiaries, #nessimonstrata, #perditafinn, #rachelreads&reviews, #schoolofsecrets, #schoolstories, #shannonhale, #suzanneselfors




