You know how sometimes you see a passing feud on a tabloid and you get into it? Like it’ so vapid, so irrelevant to your own life but somehow you managed to not only read that article but then go into the rabbit hole of everything in that feud to the point that you can give a 12 point arguement and essay about said feud just to satisfy your own feelings that you’re right about “your side”?

Okay, maybe I’m the only one whose done that but I don’t think so. I may not have gotten into the Miley-Selena-Taylor-Demi feud or Nicki vs Cardi or whatever else, but this one got my attention. Which is weird because I only got into it way after Megxit and the Netflix interview and whatnot. But it got my attention and damn, it’s one ridiculous scandal after another.

Now I have already formed opinions, but in the name of fairness I tried to as objective as possible as I read these books. So let’s start with the good parts of Prince Harry’s memoir, Spare.

The GOOD

Harry does a great job of humanizing the royal family in his memoir. Part One focuses on his childhood and he (and his ghostwriter) have done a masterful job in describing the inner sanctum of Windsor Palace. I can easily picture the walking down the hall of intimidating portraits of dour and richly-laden ancestors, knowing you have the weight of expectation heavy on your shoulders. The tinkling glass of porclein cups and china in the Queen Mum’s room as you sip tea and chat. The lush, rolling hills of the summer palace where you run and hunt in the clean, fresh air. The imagery is amazing.

As for his family, one can clearly tell that Harry holds his childhood close to his heart. He writes about his father’s flaws, his cold, uncommunicative approach taught to him by his own parents who were busy touring, and that they didn’t have much in common because Harry wasn’t book smart. Harry also shows his sensitive side. Like the fact that Charles always called him “Darling Boy,” that he knew he couldn’t put his feelings into words that well so he left notes on Harry’s pillow telling him how proud he was and he loved him, that he did his best to show up to Harry’s performances in Eton and of course, trying to break the news gently about Diana.

Seriously, that note thing was so sweet yet he later says Charles gave him generational trauma and was too cold to him. The man wrote you notes, and you didn’t save them!

Diana is the ghostly presence haunting Harry’s book, literally and metaphorically. Harry said it best in his prologue that she was indescribable despite the princess, saint, icon monikers attatched to her. He still feels her presence in a palpable way in life. She loved her boys obsessively and Harry says he feels it vice versa too.

Boy, does he deliver on that one but I’ll get to it later.

Harry’s grief is honest and palpable. Anyone who has lost someone can empathsize with the sadness that doesn’t leave. The denial and wish that they were still alive for all those little and big moments. Harry’s denial goes a bit farther as he believes that Diana isn’t truly dead but has gone into hiding. Someday, when she feels safe, she’ll contact them again.

I’ll admit I thought this was a metaphorical device highlighting how Harry wanted to believe that Diana was still watching over him. But it soon became clear that he truly believed this. Though he knew enough not to tell others his speculations, he didn’t believe it when he saw the pictures from the palace files or the PI. It was only till he went down the Parisian tunnel in the exact same speed did he realize there was no way his mother could have survived.

Make of that what you will but Harry was not lying when he said Diana is always on his mind.

Harry’s relationship with William was like most siblings as they stood by each other during Diana’s death but also had their rivalry, heightened by their respective roles in the monarchy. A role that left Harry feeling isolated and discouraged, componded by grief over his mother he began to act out.

I appreciate how Harry did not hold back on his mistakes and the backlash he faced. Like the Nazi incident where he acknlowedged he was ignorant and there had been no excuse for his choice not to learn and not to listen in school (though it was still tinged with he didn’t do it out of malice, why can’t people let it go!).

He resented how his drugs and the partying was always on the rags because other kids could do it without being accused of shaming the monarchy . The feelings are understandable and it contributed to the cycle of him lashing out more with drugs and rebellion.

Part 2 covers how the army gave him discipline and a sense of community and responsibility to protect the commonwealth. Although that also came with challenges as he resented that he was considered too precious to go on the frontlines like a mock soldier instead of a real one. But when he did get to the frontlines, it added to his mental health issues (see unable to get over grief and thinking mother is still alive) and the feeling that no one understood what he went through except his fellow veterans. That sparked his stint in founding the Invictus Games and his desire to get married so he can feel “normal” again.

Part 2 was a bit of slog as it involved tons of military jargon and describing apache planes and training etc. Maybe fellow vets will get a thrill of remembering the terrain but I was bored. But I guess it was to prove the naysayers that he did know his military stuff. It also detailed more of his dating life and his fights with the tabloids legally and physically which I guess it’s good to hear his side but it was more of the same. Resentment, anger, disdain with his family for not fighting back and telling him not to read the papers because they’re trash. At least Harry knows it’s an obsession but he can’t stop reading like picking a scab, causing more self-anguish.

Part 3 is where I’ll get to the bad. The memoir is sold as self-reflective and honeest and Harry is up to this point. Part 3 veers from honest to “his truth” which is really an agenda. You can argue every memoir has an agenda and no one wants to make themselves look bad without an excuse. But the good ones in my opinion are able to reflect enough to take accountability, therefore showcasing their growth from their mistakes.

Part 3 is where Harry stops trying to consider the feelings of others or where they’re coming from to portray himself as a heroic partner and eternal victim of the press and an unempathetic family. It is also the place where Harry shows how out-of-touch he is to reality in some respect as he tries to portray himself as smarter and relatable only for his examples to ruin it. These chapters also feature some very questionable choices.

I guess it’s time to get to the elephant in the room. Meghan and how much Harry loves her. Now, I get it when you find the one, you love them and think they’re perfect. Perfect for you.

Harry’s problem is that he tries too hard to prove that Meghan is the bestest, most perfect person ever and anyone who doesn’t see it is horrible. It’s like, a smart person doesn’t have to go on about how smart they are, a couple who’s truly in love don’t have to go on about it like a high school couple. It reads more like blind love and that’s just as unhealthy to put someone on a pedestal for you and for them.

The reason I came to this conclusion starts with how over the top Harry is when he’s describing her. I kid you not that he described each one of her outfits. He didn’t do that for anyone else in his book except for describing his army uniforms but that makes sense since some are meant to represent different ranks. But I’m supposed to believe he remembered every outfit from over 8 years ago. Maybe the first date outfit and the wedding dress but every one? And why? Some unnecessary attempt to show the world that she’s such a fashionista?

I’m pretty sure she told him because this is not a guy who’s into clothes yet he describes her “well worn jeans” and how chic she looked. No. . . that she made the clothes look chic, not the other way around. I had a casual poll and it was agreed no straight man ever uses “chic” as a fashion description.

He goes on to say how everyone looked twice when she walked into a room. How smart and gorgeous she was. She was always kind, never a mean word about anyone. She made being royal look easy just like his mom. He continually states how everyone was blown away by her and that he was so thankful she was forgiving when he was late to their date because he couldn’t imagine why anyone would make her wait. Like, you’d think she was royalty instead of him. But then again he says that maybe she was born to be a princess.

I mean, I want a guy to think I’m great too but yeesh, the hyperbole was ridiculous.

He describes how the family was in awe of her. That even though Harry never heard of her, apparently Kate and William were religious fans of Suits. That his father was like a giggly school boy meeting her. But they were also not welcoming to his beloved girlfriend/wife, not understanding her Cali casualness and didn’t do enough to help or understand her. So they simultaneously loved her and were jealous of her. It’s too contradictory.

That should have been Harry’s responsibility. But he felt, and I quote, that he thought it was great that Meghan didn’t know about the monarchy. That not knowing about the ins and out was vital to surviving it.

No, vital to surviving it would be being prepared!!!!

Of course, Harry believes Meghan never googled him just because she said so. That she didn’t even know anything about Diane which is such a ridiculous lie. Even if she was that naieve, I still think Harry had a responsibility to prepare her as William did with Kate so she wouldn’t have made so many blunders that sent the tabloids after her. It’s just common sense.

Also I’m apparently supposed to believe they met on instagram. In their original engagement interview they said a mutual friend set them up on a blind date. Okay, sure. In Harry’s memoir he was apparently scrolling through insta one day and saw a girl with a dog filter and just had to know more! A girl with a dog filter? The kind that obscures your face with a cartoony tongue, nose and ears? That’s what made him fall in love? I’m sorry, I don’t buy it and I don’t get why they felt the need to change it from the original. A mutual friend set them up, is there something shady about it that they felt the need to lie?

Then there’s the fact that Meghan reminds him of his mother. Like literally, that she’s practically a reincarnation, she’s so kind and pure and why can’t anyone else see it?

I mean, the guy loves his mother but most sane people see that as a red flag to any relationship. Your wife is supposed to be a different sort of person for you than your mother. Most people would run away if their spouse reminded them of their mother or their spouse said that to them. But he’s a prince so I can see why Meghan stays despite the creepiness of that. But it shows Harry meant the whole obsession thing.

Harry also describes Meghan as whipsmart yet fragile and naive like his mother that she’s in tears about the paparazzi intrusion. Sure, I can believe that press intrusion as the royal girlfriend is different than press as a Hollywood actress but the harrowing experience of four people trying to take her picture was laughable as he described them in cartoonishly evil way. Also Meghan’s shock that they can write lies about her, is something I can only read in a Snow White-esque voice. “I don’t understand. Can they just make stuff up?“

“Yes they can. And yes they do.”

This was really new information to them? Harry may have trying to be portray them as victimized innocents, but it makes them look moronic. Two people in their late 30s and early 40s who grew up in the public sphere didn’t know tabloids have no qualms about lying?

It should also be noted how Harry glosses over the scandals that happened during their time as royals. While I don’t doubt Meghan was unfairly criticized at some parts, I think some of it was fair reporting pointing out contradictory statements. Like when she committed perjury in court.

Perjury where she “forgot” that she collaborated with a biographer in over 30 email exchanges. Perjury where she wrote a letter to her father in a way that she knew would manipulate the heartstrings if it got leaked. Which it did, and shows she can be quite manipulative when she puts her mind to it. The fact she invited celebrities she didn’t know to her wedding and no one in her mother’s family (I don’t mention the father’s family because she was feuding with them, but seriously no one from her mother’s side).

I distinctly remember how Harry and Meghan said they didn’t want a title for Archie when he was born so he could be normal. I remember that because I thought if I was a kid I’d be annoyed my parents decided to make me normal instead of a prince. Yet they go on Oprah saying the royal family wouldn’t make him a prince.

They said they were married three days before the actual wedding (which was just a spectacle for the public’s benefits? Uh if it was just a spectacle than why was it more expensive than your brother’s? You’re the spare, people wouldn’t mind if it was smaller. Oh right, cuz you wanted it). Then the archbishop confirmed it was lie.

That your super sweet kind wife goes to charities and homeless shelters dripping with jewelry and expensive name-brands which is completely inappropriate and mean.

No acknowledgement because Harry probably doesn’t think any of this really happened and it’s a vicious lie cooked up by mean press. He also says that his family was unfairly influenced by the tabloids, that they believed their lies. Maybe Harry will believe anything that comes out of Meghan’s mouth but I give the royal family more credit that maybe their displeasure with Meghan came from first-hand interactions with her behavior rather than blindly believing tabloid junk.

Then there’s how Harry’s tune changes with his family. While we read about the cracks like Charles’ need to have good publicity at the expense of his sons and willingness to sabatoge them to do so, and the continued brotherly rivalry, Harry becomes downright hostile. He sees their unwillingness to fight back as a flaw, someone who is unwilling to stand up for him and his wife when. . . they kinda have a good point not to throw fuel on the media fire. He just takes offense to it.

There’s also all the projection that Wiliam was jealous of him. Jealous of his popularity and less scrutiny and responsibilities as the spare. That William always defined the two of them by their respective roles. Okay, I can buy the latter not so much the popularity thing and defining themselves as heir and spare. Just look at the news.

Maybe William is jealous that Harry has less scrutiny because he’s not the heir, but Harry is jealous too. He’s the one on the news complaining that he doesn’t have medals anymore, that his residence wasn’t as large as William’s, that William got more time with their grandmother in his royal training, that William got more privileges. I can see that Harry is jealous that he wasn’t treated exactly the same as his brother. The fact that Harry continually calls himself the spare and names the book after it says more about how Harry defines himself than anything.

I call it projection. Especially when Harry details their fights, he always vaguely words whatever he said in the fight or describes him as the aggrieved one while William is an aggressive bully. Considering the most we’ve seen William lose his temper is in harsh words while Harry has photographic evidence (and in the memoir too) of assaulting others (including his bodyguard!), I think we know has more of a temper even if he glosses it over.

Harry’s memoir is also contradictory. Not just about the paparazzi. He views Camilla as dangerous, not just as a homewrecker but in some other way that wasn’t clearly explained in my opinion. Then Harry believes the palace is not only not doing enough to protect Harry and Meghan but is also leaking stories to the press. Yet in the same memoir, few pages later he emphasizes how the palace does investigations on the leaks and the family is very close-lipped in protecting the ranks. He’s just very paranoid.

Finally, there’s how Harry has certain passages that are supposed to be funny or relatable and they just make him look in need of a therapist. A good one, not the person he met in this book because if he went to a good therapist maybe he would have spared us all these passages that make him look out of touch, dumb and psychologically unwell.

Like the whole hitting his bodyguard thing, Harry sees nothing wrong with that just as he saw assaulting the paparazzi as something they deserved after intruding on his privacy so much. He sees almost all the negative press as slander and trying to ruin him when. . . honestly he could avoid it if he didn’t do as many dumb things like naked pool in Vegas.

When he was a teenager in boarding school, he liked almost all his beautiful, maternal matrons except Pat. She was ugly, Harry says, ugly and mean, being the only who really disciplined the boys. She has crooked knees and back problems, so much that walking was painful for her which made her more mean. Harry say that as a prime target for mocking and making faces at her slow walk down the stairs. He was the leader as he liked being class clown. Okay, dick move but he’s a dumb teenager.

Now with all this hindsight and maturity as a 40 year old he thinks that maybe Pat would think on this and laugh too. Yes, I’m sure a woman would suffering from painful arthritis and crooked legs would look back on this incident and laugh. It’s just mean and Harry doesn’t see it.

Honestly, Harry namecalls everyone he doesn’t like (and they usually fall into the media or someone who isn’t “empathetic” enough to excuse him because of all the troubles in his life). All the reporters, some of whom he calls by name are viciously torn apart as vultures with no empathy.

For all he says about loving his brother, he is also incredibly petty in pointing out his baldness and that he looks less like Diane’s son because of it. Which buddy, I’ve seen pictures, you’re balding too. Bringing up incidents like Kate reluctantly sharing lipstick with Meghan like this is some deleted from Mean Girls. I mean, Kate did share but did it reluctantly, the horror. And he explains that this was another UK/US culture difference. Which no? It’s not American to share lip gloss, it’s unhygenic.

He is also very distrustful of his grandmother’s advisors, painting them as puppeteers trying to control his grandmother and vying for power of the throne. Each one he eviscerates as pests with names like The Fly, The Wasp and so on. You can tell he’s been piling up the resentment but it also insults his grandmother by painting her as a doddering elder controlled by her advisors and his father/brother. She didn’t want to push him out but all these other forces did.

I find that hard to believe. I’m sure she loved him but I can’t imagine she was pleased either by how Harry and Meghan were breaking protocol nor that they were willing to hurt the royal family that she was the head of for decades. Harry’s actions have consequences but he’s unwilling to accept that. He thinks its a conspiracy by those who see him as a stupid and irrelevant spare.

This whole book is a piece about how they have been the most victimized couple, everyone is against them especially with the security thing. I’d like to point out that only the direct line of royals get the professional security he wants (and mainly during events I believe, so not 24/7 as Harry is aiming for).

His aunt, Princess Anne was actually targeted and almost killed. Her bodyguard was killed. She didn’t get permenant extra security though. His cousins are the daughters of the dispised Prince Andrew, they don’t get security even though they could be the targets of a nutcase taking the anger about their father on them. Yet Harry makes no mention of that. If Harry really cared about an unfair system, he’d try to advocate that everyone should get more security. But nope, it’s just about them because they’re sooo (self) important.

Though I think they could pay for their own security if they had bought a modest penthouse apartment for four instead of a mansion with 16 bathrooms, cinema, gym and 5-car garage. Think of the money they could have saved to pay for their much-needed security. But what do I know?

There’s also the fun incident when Meghan was in labor and he sucked all the nitruous gas. He described it as funny and Meghan and the nurse laugh but who does that? What husband uses all the pain relief his wife needs?!? And why does he want to be high when he meets his child for the first time?

He also describes the time he was so drunk out of his mind that he thought Courtney Cox’s toilet was talking to him. I suppose it was to show his deepest momentbut just struck me as weird. He did just fine talking about his dark time adjusting after Afghanistan, this was an unneeded chapter. Then again, he described ayusca as almost as good as therapy so we’re not dealing with a psychologically healed person here.

Harry is also very obsessed with his todger. That’s British for penis. Prince Privacy not only decides to answer the world’s pressing question about whether he and William are uncircumsied (they are) but he tells all about the frost bitten penis. We all know about the Elizabeth Arden cream, but what I found to be laughably contradictory to his statement about privacy is that he gave a two page spread about his frostbitten penis exam.

I have no idea why he thought this was a necessity. He even said in the book that at the time he worried about the press finding out because they’d have a field day. So why reveal this all these years later when there was no threat of them leaking it before? And it’s detailed! Where’s the logic?

He todger comes up again when he worried about being late to another date with Meghan. The problem being he was on a boat without a bathroom and his attempts to pee over the stern go awry so he pees in his pants instead. Again, this is completely unnecessary. He could just say he was going to be late to his date with Meghan. Why we needed to know about him peeing his pants?!? I have no idea but this is one book ripe for psychoanalysis.

Personally, I think the only place bodily fluids and todgers should be in a memoir is nowhere.

Oh and I can’t forget this hilarious line-“What was the universe out to prove by taking my penis at the same moment it took my brother? (187).”

And not only does he blow up his own privacy by talking about his privates, he ruins that of his family by providing text messages, and detailed conversations he had with them. He just doesn’t see the hypocrisy of his actions. Nor this whole book! After spending most of it complaining about press intrusion, he is apparently willing to give his away from publishing money. Thus making the heroic image he paints himself with totally moot.

Same with the whole escaping the dangerous UK of paparazzi and racism to go to LA, CA, USA-the land of paparazzi and racism. ‘Cuz logic.
Finally, there’s the addition that in Harry’s attempts to be literary, he talks about how he likes Steinbeck’s book (because it was short) Of Mice and Men and how connects with the character of Lennie, a simple, loyal man who ends up killing his friend and hurting his brother. . . it says a lot. Possibly one of the most self-aware moments in the memoir.

So in conclusion, Harry is a complicated man. I don’t deny he has had a hard time in life, and when he’s honest and reflective, you can see he does have his good side, connecting with others, feeling their pain and able to see that with his privileges, he could use them to help. I believe he does want to do good in world.

Yet he is held back by his own vices like his emotionally stunted behavior, resentment and wanting to be a hero, and never the villain, lashing out when someone points out his flaws as a personal attack. Until he comes to peace with himself and his role in life, he’ll never measure up to the view he wants the world to have of himself.

---

Now to my thoughts on Tom Bower’s Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the War Between the Windsors which I promise to be much shorter as it doesn’t have many contradictions or psychosis to analyze.

This is a riveting book diving into Meghan Markle’s simple beginnings to her attempt at A-list and her ruthlessness in her ability to use and discard anyone to get to the top yet doesn’t fit her ‘brand” which she effortlessly changes like a chameleon to get her goal.

Now you may think this is biased reporting meant to expose and take down Meghan. But Bower was a lawyer, and he has over 800 sources and citations. Now, maybe you think these sources could be anyone with an agenda, willing to lie just to see Meghan fail in a perverse sense of schendefruede. I understand that, but again, Bower is a lawyer, he probably will do his best to weed out the lies from the truth to protect himself from liabel.

And I believe he succeeded because Harry and Meghan have been in court several times, and on public forums calling tabloids and certain public figures for liabel and defamation claims. They have not said one word about suing Bower. They haven’t said anything about this book in general. Sometimes the silent subtext says it all. If there was some truth to the events mentioned in this book, they wouldn’t want to bring people’s attention to it by making a fuss. So with that logical inference, I think I can safely say the information is based on truth.

It helps that Bower is balanced in his reporting, showcasing reporters and tabloids that negatively attacked Meghan with a nitpicking, sexist, classist, racist bent along with the reports that exposed Meghan for her genuine bad behaviors. There are those who talk about how she used them and others who say Meghan is the kindest person in the world and a great friend. So I believe Bower did his best to be fair.

That extends to other players in this book too like Prince/King Charles who was blindsided by the couple’s actions but is also publicity-hungry and devious himself. Tomas Markle isn’t completely the innocent father but he also doesn’t deserve to be cut out and vilified so ruthlessly by his own daughter.

It doesn’t change that exposes Meghan in a primarily negative light because. . . maybe Meghan is just not the best person. It’s sad how she’s insecure that she changes herself to fit the situation, to be the guy’s dream girl instead of being heself. But it doesn’t change how easily she manipulates, lies and belittles others with an inflated sense of ego that borders on narcissistic. The same could be said of Harry too, the couple enabling each other’s worst traits.

Bower lays out this book much like a legal case, going in chronological order and how things build up to its ugly climax. In that method, Bower can get a bit repetitive though as he mentions certain events and then would bring them again when he got to that part of the timeline.

In the interest of making this shorter, Bower’s book is linear going from Meghan’s childhood, her first marriage, meeting and marrying Harry, royal life, Megxit and their escape to America/their charity/Oprah interview and ends with Phillip’s death and the irreversible split between them and the rest of the royals. He shows the clear lies and contradictions between the public story, Harry/Meghan’s story and the truth.

It’s best you read it all yourself but I’ll highlight some of Meghan’s worse actions that cement my view that she’s just as bad and out of touch as Harry.

-Committing perjury twice. I mentioned it before when I was talking about Harry’s glossing over Meghan’s behavior but it takes a lot of nerve and little moral qualms if you’re willing to perjure yourself in court.

-Telling her father to cut himself off from his other kids, her half-siblings or else she’d stop associating with all of them because they’re an embarassment. I can understand her not wanting to contact her half-siblings because they do seem like crazy white trash but telling their father to do that? Big balls, there madam.

-Mailing her wedding ring to her husband to signify her desire to divorce. No talk beforehand or anything, just totally blindsiding him.

-Cheating on her boyfriend whom she was living with, with Harry.

-Acting like a diva, and belittling the staff working under her be it an ad campaign or as a working royal. Apparently, Harry’s explosive temper with his staff further exacerbated the issue causing fast turn-over unseen in other royal households.

-Dumping or ghosting her castmates (literally invited them to their wedding but not the ceremony afterwards so they had to go to karoke because they hadn’t been informed. But you know, the Clooneys made the list even though she didn’t know them), her agent, her childhood friends, her adult best friend, anyone that wasn’t her level when she became a royal. She had actually had two receptions, one for her old friends that she wasn’t going to contact again, and one for new ones. Tell me again, Harry, how nice she is.

-Totally out of touch by focusing on her struggles when she’s surrounded by war orphans in the most poverty-stricken places in the world. The same doc where she says she wasn’t used to tabloids because the US didn’t have them there (yeah, her home being LA, home of the tabloids which she should know as an actress?!? Her lies aren’t even that believable)

-Using the race card everytime she got criticism even though she acknowledges she’s never been treated like a black woman before, said she was white in casting calls, and didn’t want to be defined by her race.

-Joined UN women then quit in a huff when they didn’t make her an ambassador like Emma Watson since she didn’t have the humanitarian history or popularity. Then avoided them when she was a royal because they didn’t deserve her presence. Nothing says humanitarian being unable to put aside your feelings for the cause.

-Their charity, Archewell, and it’s 11 companies are located in Delaware so they could take advantage of the state’s financial secracy laws so people can’t see their reports or know whether income is used for charity or personal use. See above about the humanitarian thing.

-There is evidence that they’re using that money to buy their own trophies like the NAACP award for standing up to systematic racism (by giving donating money and giving an Oprah interview apparently). In the same ceremony that announced they donated their $100,000 award, the NAACP-Archewell Digital Civil Rights Award. Surely just a coincidence. The kicker is that months later, Harry would promote Spare and say they never called the royal family racist. Just full of unconscious bias. They certainly didn’t clarify that when they were onstage.

All of which says a lot about the content of Meghan’s character than anything about the color of skin.

Now, I don’t they’re not evil people bent on destroying the monarchy as some outlets describe them. Smearing it maybe, but they’re unable to keep their stories straight to achieve that as they hate the institution for being racist but they want their kids to have titles. Oh, and they want to return because even though they made his wife suicidal, and made them run away to America, they’re . . . okay I can’t stand how contradictory they are that I can’t give the appropriate sarcasm for this.

Maybe Harry is just lost, deep in his grief and his immense privilege makes him unable to see that it’s not only about him. Maybe Meghan is desperate for validation and her sudden elevation went to her head. Or maybe they’ve always been like this.

You can decide after you read their words, see their actions and read this deep dive into the latest infamous branch of the British Royal Family.

P.S. But what really cements my negative feelings about the duo is their treatment of animals. Harry has committed animal abuse against his polo ponies. And because Meghan’s dog didn’t like him, she left him in Canada. She lied that he was too old to move to England (he was 5) but omg the dog is supposed to be her baby and she gives it up for a man! A moronic one at that if Spare is anything to go by. That is so mean. She gives up her friends and her dog in her pursuit for fame. Well one of them, she had two and brought only one of them to England which again, she split up the dog friends! Harry even admits that the queen’s corgis don’t like him which. . . he needs a long, hard look in the mirror if so many dogs don’t like him. Dogs know!